Thoughts on the Law, Building a GPT, and Tsunamis of Change
I play with toys to process deep thoughts, y'all.
I've been having a bit of fun with ChatGPT's new 'Create a GPT' feature. Right now, it's only available for paying subscribers.
I'm in the process of writing a piece musing on consent, the law, and artificial intelligence, and wanted to summarize some of the law review and scientific literature that's already been written, find trends and topics to explore, and generally wade through what are oftentimes overly verbose pieces. After a whole bunch of trial and error (enough to say, take up the time for reading 2 of the 9 or so articles I found), I created a niche, specific purpose Summarizer GPT. It's pretty good at at least drawing out repeated themes, core concepts and keywords, and distilling down the author's main points.
For the sake of transparency, I dumped the (slightly cleaned up) output of one of the law review articles I read (From Transparency to Justification: Toward Ex Ante Accountability for AI, by Gianclaudio Malgieri and Frank Pasquale) here. There's also a direct link to…
Keep reading with a 7-day free trial
Subscribe to Privacat Insights to keep reading this post and get 7 days of free access to the full post archives.